|
|
|
|
|
You can purchase a copy of my first photo book titled
MONTANA MEGALITHS IN THE USA by clicking on this link: Product My second photo book titled Montana Megaliths: Dolmens in Montana, USA features photographs and narrative about the dolmens in Montana. Several photographs of the ancient flash fossilized beings are included. Product |
|
MICHAEL PELL
Michael Pell writes on his FB Group Page -- The Missun’ Lynx , " I have learned many things from those that share and participate here. I look forward to their information and then discussing possibilities that may arise from the pooled data.
The key is trying to think as the ancient did at their level of understanding at the time they recorded material. Then in what context is that information shared such as metaphorically or interpretation of what they witnessed (but not scientifically understand). Done in a respectful and cordial manner, it is an honor to partake with such as great crowd of people."
The key is trying to think as the ancient did at their level of understanding at the time they recorded material. Then in what context is that information shared such as metaphorically or interpretation of what they witnessed (but not scientifically understand). Done in a respectful and cordial manner, it is an honor to partake with such as great crowd of people."
|
|
Michael Pell has requested that all of his ideas are presented as possibilities and that they are not presented as facts.
Michael Pell has made major contributions with his vast knowledge base, correlating data, incredible graphics and insights into the authenticity of the Montana Megaliths over the years.
"There should be records, both full or partial of what once was. When located and truthfully shared, it will paint a picture of the interrelationships between life and it’s environs as conditions change through gradual time or sudden impact like a near extinction event. It will show the tenacity life has and needs in order to survive and adapt to the new conditions."---Michael Pell .
On December 21, 2023 Michael Pell writes:
A good example of why becoming SOLELY dependent on tech is not a wise thing.
Tech makes many things more simple, potentially quicker, and accessible but is at the mercy of the sources that power it.
I stress it is of equal or more important to learn and keep a few hands on skills for survival should the day ever arrive.
Sheer panic and chaos is truly just a few minutes away at the best of times. Modern society has weaved itself a security that is extremely fragile. A sudden cataclysmic event could extinguish it in a heartbeat.
A good example of why becoming SOLELY dependent on tech is not a wise thing.
Tech makes many things more simple, potentially quicker, and accessible but is at the mercy of the sources that power it.
I stress it is of equal or more important to learn and keep a few hands on skills for survival should the day ever arrive.
Sheer panic and chaos is truly just a few minutes away at the best of times. Modern society has weaved itself a security that is extremely fragile. A sudden cataclysmic event could extinguish it in a heartbeat.
Micheal Pell writes:
"Unknown what the constructors of these structures called them or what their intentions are. That is the guessing game of trying to figure out what or why the Montana Megaliths are about.
Everyone has their own ideas as collectively we chip away at tabled evidence to see what holds consistent as a possible theory until facts become actually known. Julie and her ground crew have the advantage to walk among and visually record (along with sensory perception) of these structures. Might sound silly but this complex will “talk” to those Experiencers once the visitor is “dialed in”.
I work mainly off of Julie’s written word, photos and collaborative videos she makes with others. EVERYTHING I suggest is based purely on guesses derived from running her findings through what I call the “astronomical filter”. By doing so I have found many things that make sense IF what we find in Montana was developed using the sky as a template to “tell the story”.
I am confident enough to think it is based on what we find on a global scale. The numbers and orientation will play key factors to prove or disprove this concept.When I see fire and/or flight imagery in ancient artifacts that symbolizes to me a solar reference in that the Sun is considered a flying fire in simplistic of terms.
As I believe that the MM is addressing a life/death/rebirth motif the Phoenix bird rising from the ashes fits in nicely. That the city Phoenix is due south of the MM and ties to the ancient equator via Easter Island seems connected to me (my opinion only).
I may read into it more than what is there but I just toss the ideas out there to be considered or dismissed as needed. Pell writes:
"Unknown what the constructors of these structures called them or what their intentions are. That is the guessing game of trying to figure out what or why the Montana Megaliths are about.
Everyone has their own ideas as collectively we chip away at tabled evidence to see what holds consistent as a possible theory until facts become actually known. Julie and her ground crew have the advantage to walk among and visually record (along with sensory perception) of these structures. Might sound silly but this complex will “talk” to those Experiencers once the visitor is “dialed in”.
I work mainly off of Julie’s written word, photos and collaborative videos she makes with others. EVERYTHING I suggest is based purely on guesses derived from running her findings through what I call the “astronomical filter”. By doing so I have found many things that make sense IF what we find in Montana was developed using the sky as a template to “tell the story”.
I am confident enough to think it is based on what we find on a global scale. The numbers and orientation will play key factors to prove or disprove this concept.When I see fire and/or flight imagery in ancient artifacts that symbolizes to me a solar reference in that the Sun is considered a flying fire in simplistic of terms.
As I believe that the MM is addressing a life/death/rebirth motif the Phoenix bird rising from the ashes fits in nicely. That the city Phoenix is due south of the MM and ties to the ancient equator via Easter Island seems connected to me (my opinion only).
I may read into it more than what is there but I just toss the ideas out there to be considered or dismissed as needed.
"Unknown what the constructors of these structures called them or what their intentions are. That is the guessing game of trying to figure out what or why the Montana Megaliths are about.
Everyone has their own ideas as collectively we chip away at tabled evidence to see what holds consistent as a possible theory until facts become actually known. Julie and her ground crew have the advantage to walk among and visually record (along with sensory perception) of these structures. Might sound silly but this complex will “talk” to those Experiencers once the visitor is “dialed in”.
I work mainly off of Julie’s written word, photos and collaborative videos she makes with others. EVERYTHING I suggest is based purely on guesses derived from running her findings through what I call the “astronomical filter”. By doing so I have found many things that make sense IF what we find in Montana was developed using the sky as a template to “tell the story”.
I am confident enough to think it is based on what we find on a global scale. The numbers and orientation will play key factors to prove or disprove this concept.When I see fire and/or flight imagery in ancient artifacts that symbolizes to me a solar reference in that the Sun is considered a flying fire in simplistic of terms.
As I believe that the MM is addressing a life/death/rebirth motif the Phoenix bird rising from the ashes fits in nicely. That the city Phoenix is due south of the MM and ties to the ancient equator via Easter Island seems connected to me (my opinion only).
I may read into it more than what is there but I just toss the ideas out there to be considered or dismissed as needed. Pell writes:
"Unknown what the constructors of these structures called them or what their intentions are. That is the guessing game of trying to figure out what or why the Montana Megaliths are about.
Everyone has their own ideas as collectively we chip away at tabled evidence to see what holds consistent as a possible theory until facts become actually known. Julie and her ground crew have the advantage to walk among and visually record (along with sensory perception) of these structures. Might sound silly but this complex will “talk” to those Experiencers once the visitor is “dialed in”.
I work mainly off of Julie’s written word, photos and collaborative videos she makes with others. EVERYTHING I suggest is based purely on guesses derived from running her findings through what I call the “astronomical filter”. By doing so I have found many things that make sense IF what we find in Montana was developed using the sky as a template to “tell the story”.
I am confident enough to think it is based on what we find on a global scale. The numbers and orientation will play key factors to prove or disprove this concept.When I see fire and/or flight imagery in ancient artifacts that symbolizes to me a solar reference in that the Sun is considered a flying fire in simplistic of terms.
As I believe that the MM is addressing a life/death/rebirth motif the Phoenix bird rising from the ashes fits in nicely. That the city Phoenix is due south of the MM and ties to the ancient equator via Easter Island seems connected to me (my opinion only).
I may read into it more than what is there but I just toss the ideas out there to be considered or dismissed as needed.
|
|
Amber's Compass is a large stone circle, in the Montana Megaliths South, with upright menhirs in the center of the circle. The circumference stones are clearly delineated from Google Earth.
On December 28. 2023 Michael Pell posted the photo above and commented:
Amber’s Compass is a very interesting layout. The overhead alignment does somewhat match the layout of the main stars that compromise the constellation Orion and is something to consider, but by no means proof that that is what was used when developing the area.
With additional examination (without having been there) working from photos supplied by Julie Ryder and her ground crew, I am more convinced Amber’s Compass is a SOLAR related structure that is marking key sun positions throughout the year.
Namely the spring and winter solstices as well as the two equinoxes (vernal/spring and autumnal/fall).
It is wondered if the series of menhirs are naturally tipped or deliberately tipped. I am suggesting they are deliberately tipped as they are almost spot on to sun angles as they would be experienced at the Helena, Montana latitude. For all three to be in solar ball park values appears more than coincidental, but I leave that up to you to decide.
Angles and direction once truly measured and recorded will point to a solar related connection if that is indeed the source behind their placement.
Sun Angles for Helena, Montana
Sun angle at equinoxes:
90-46.5891=43.4109°
Sun angle at Summer solstice:
43.4109+23.28=66.6909°
Sun Angle at winter solstice:
43.4109-23.28=20.1309°
Compare to the Amber’s Compass photo (above).
Connected?
Amber’s Compass is a very interesting layout. The overhead alignment does somewhat match the layout of the main stars that compromise the constellation Orion and is something to consider, but by no means proof that that is what was used when developing the area.
With additional examination (without having been there) working from photos supplied by Julie Ryder and her ground crew, I am more convinced Amber’s Compass is a SOLAR related structure that is marking key sun positions throughout the year.
Namely the spring and winter solstices as well as the two equinoxes (vernal/spring and autumnal/fall).
It is wondered if the series of menhirs are naturally tipped or deliberately tipped. I am suggesting they are deliberately tipped as they are almost spot on to sun angles as they would be experienced at the Helena, Montana latitude. For all three to be in solar ball park values appears more than coincidental, but I leave that up to you to decide.
Angles and direction once truly measured and recorded will point to a solar related connection if that is indeed the source behind their placement.
Sun Angles for Helena, Montana
Sun angle at equinoxes:
90-46.5891=43.4109°
Sun angle at Summer solstice:
43.4109+23.28=66.6909°
Sun Angle at winter solstice:
43.4109-23.28=20.1309°
Compare to the Amber’s Compass photo (above).
Connected?
Winter solstice elongated shadows from menhirs to semi circle rock on the northern side.
Michael Pell
Michael Pell
The stones in Amber's Compass are in the same position as the stars in the
Orion Constellation.
Michael Pell
Orion Constellation.
Michael Pell
AMBER'S COMPASS REVISITED
=======================
By Michael Pell
=======================
By Michael Pell
An overhead of Amber's Compass located at the Montana Megaliths. Does it look like anything to you?
|
Options are available for investigation!
|
Read in order the following commentary and illustrations tell the story
Note how the sun angles at the horizon level match the centers of the Giza pyramid baselines. Why I believe their orientation is solar based rather than constellation emulating.
|
Note how the sun angles at the horizon level match the centers of the Giza pyramid baselines. Why I believe their orientation is solar based rather than constellation emulating.
|
Now with the sun added. To the left, the smallest pyramid lines up with shortest day at winter solstice. The middle pyramid lines up with the spring and fall equinoxes and the biggest pyramid on the right matches the longest day at summer solstice. Pyramid size may then be reflective of day length at these 4 important calendar dates related to sun positions.
|
I am not certain if the outer casing that has been stripped from the pyramids followed suit to the eight angles, but if it did, might they be like hour and minute counters for creeping or receding shadows caused as the sun swung around them each day, acting like sundials?
|
|
Michael Pell writes: "The Amber's Compass menhirs that are located offset by what appears to be 23.5° angle from it's east/west circle's circumference. If so, this would match an overlay of Earth's tilt, equator and Tropic of Cancer and Capricorn lines. Indicating a solar based purpose."
"What I think the menhirs are referring to. Another option might be recording the nadir and zenith points of a given object (sun or constellation) from a singular axial swing due south." Michael Pell 12/24/2022 |
|
As the sun here would be southwest, an example of shadow play. A different time of the year closer to winter solstice would result in longer shadows as seen here. |
|
|
In the year 10,450 bce the constellation Orion sits at it's nadir point due to axial tilt and the procession cycle. The perfect opportunity to commence and/or end a long count and begin a new one. Note that during this time, the sun is rising in the House of Leo in the east. Hence why I believe the Sphinx was a lion originally that faces in that direction, though rather than being built in 10,450 bce which is when I believe the pyramids were built, the Sphinx would have been built one processional cycle earlier in 36,370 bce when the sky conditions were identical. |
Sun angles vary depending on geographic location. As they would appear at the equator.
|
As the sun angles appear around the 40° latitude.
|
Here showing where the constellation Orion is seen in the sky from Giza in the year 10,450 bce when it sits at the lowest point possible near the horizon at noon on the spring equinox. Note how the star Alcyone in the Pleiades is sitting exactly at 33°. A common number in Masonic practice and sacred geometry.
|
One half of a precessional cycle of 25,920 years later from the year 10,450 bce when Orion sits at nadir would be when Orion reaches it's zenith before beginning to descend again to it's nadir point. That would represent 12,960 years into the future from 10,450 bce. That will occur in 2510 ce, 492 years from now (2018). Note how much higher Orion is as seen from Giza above the horizon compared to 10,450 bce, as a result of the changing Earth axis.
|
In addition to Orion, the sun sits at a given height when seen from Giza during 10,450 bce with Orion at nadir. Check the altitude on the bottom left for the sun. 36°
We see those numbers in a 360° circle. 3+6 = 9 |
Now check the sun at high noon on the spring equinox due south when Orion is at it's zenith position in 2510 ce. Again, the altitude in the lower left. Sun is now at 60°.
Half of that is 30°. Half acting like an equator of sorts. Is that why Giza, Mesopotamia and Indus Valley were developed at the 30° latitude falling on the "ancient equator"? Is it based on the Sun's highest obtainable height in the sky from the "navel of the Earth" co-ordinate before the axial tilt begins to sway in the opposite direction? |
The Amber's Compass menhirs that are located offset by what appears to be 23.5° angle from it's east/west circle's circumference. If so, this would match an overlay of Earth's tilt, equator and Tropic of Cancer and Capricorn lines. Indicating a solar based purpose.
|
What I think the menhirs are referring to. Another option might be recording the nadir and zenith points of a given object (sun or constellation) from a singular axial swing due south.
To confirm, precise angles and direction will need to be recorded, currently underway over time by on the ground Members of the Montana Megaliths research team. This will either support this theory or call for a different line of thinking if needed. |
How the menhirs may be acting like a sun dial in conjunction with the circular rock to the rear north side. Note the shadows on the ground.
|
How the menhirs may be acting like a sun dial in conjunction with the circular rock to the rear north side. Note the shadows on the ground.
|
On April 10, 2023 Michael Pell added:
For those unfamiliar, the menhirs at Amber’s Compass appear to be angled at key Sun angles during the year, as if deliberately placed to mark the zenith positions of the Sun, due south of the direction they face (as a guess).
Sun Angles for Helena, Montana
Sun angle at equinoxes:
90-46.5891=43.4109°
Sun angle at Summer solstice:
43.4109+23.28=66.6909°
Sun Angle at winter solstice:
43.4109-23.28=20.1309°
For those unfamiliar, the menhirs at Amber’s Compass appear to be angled at key Sun angles during the year, as if deliberately placed to mark the zenith positions of the Sun, due south of the direction they face (as a guess).
Sun Angles for Helena, Montana
Sun angle at equinoxes:
90-46.5891=43.4109°
Sun angle at Summer solstice:
43.4109+23.28=66.6909°
Sun Angle at winter solstice:
43.4109-23.28=20.1309°
AMBER'S COMPASS REVISITED: The Narrative
=======================
This is a lengthy post, but worth reading through if you are interested in the Montana Megaliths.
Awhile ago Julie Ryder posted an overhead view of what is termed Amber's Compass. A photo of an area showing a crest of a hill with randomly scattered rocks. Is there something actually there reconfigured by an ancient civilization, or Nature's work that coincidentally looks like something?
Not proven one way or the other scientifically as of yet, it is left up to us to see if there is anything to see at all. The first photo shows the image in question. Can YOU see anything?
When you look at ancient sites long enough you begin to see similarities between them. Mainly in orientation to horizon points as well as construction design.
Are we to believe that each individual global civilization in the beginning all decided to undertake a building style unbeknownst of each other, such as dolmen construction, pyramid building, ziggurats and the like, or does it make more sense that a civilization already well versed in such technique travelled around the globe introducing their science and technology to pockets of civilizations encountered?The latter makes more sense to me.
Following along with Andrew Barker's multi tiered construction phases whereby initial building takes place at specific sites and then followup generations tweak and refurbish those sites to "modernize" them for their own societal needs makes sense. We do that today when we tear down structures to rebuild on the same footprint, or alter existing structures. So why wouldn't have ancient cultures?
I am going to cover a few areas in this post which to me when looked at with an open mind and use of an astronomical filter makes sense. The concept of time to the ancients would be as important to them as it is to us. Clues as to when to plant, nurture and harvest crops, rising waters, etc., being calculable. Preparation for off seasons in areas where climatic change in temperate climates necessitated the need for storing goods as we as a species became less nomadic and more domesticated into urban centers adding farming and grain growth as well as hunting and gathering to our skill levels for survival.
How or why the three earliest civilization's ALL settled on the 30° north parallel based on the phi formula? By chance, terrain, design, or combination of some or all of those? Or follow up civilizations, which dates for their existence get pushed back even farther than currently thought? We are aware of the cradle of civilization and the Fertile Crescent. The out of Africa theory, now challenged by the out of Australia theory, the populating of the America's and DNA migration tracing, etc.
It appears that what has been written will be rewritten and if need be, rightly so.
I feel a 30,000 year old date for some parts of the Montana Megaliths is right on que. It would fit in nicely with the time period I believe was known by the Ancient Egyptians as Zep Tepi. I believe that that period was tied to precession of the Earth and a perfect start/stop point for recording that 25,920 year long count, made available in the year 10,450 bce. Included in the photos is a diagram showing the view of the sky as seen from Giza/Cairo in that year. You can see that the constellation Orion is at nadir (lowest point in the sky it will reach before moving back up). As a perfect opportunity to be used as a time recording start point, the constellation will begin to move upward for the next 12,960 years. Reaching it's zenith position at the halfway point of the 25,920 year processional cycle, at which time it begins to move back down again in cyclic fashion.
When using this constellation as seen at Giza (known as the navel of the Earth's land mass), someone was aware of that local's significant meaning and thus provided for a good location for time keeping measures. The sky therefore from a given locale would look exactly the same orientation every 25,920 years, changing ever so slightly by 2.4° of cyclic axial tilt every 41,000 years. So in other words the Earth is not only rocking it is also swaying on it's axis simultaneously as it orbits the sun. Something I believe we might see as a result of being hit by a comet or asteroid at one time, disrupting an otherwise stable spin from a fixed axial point.
The diagram showing Orion at it's nadir point as seen from Giza in 10,450 bce is accompanied by another showing it at it's zenith in 2510 ce so you can see the difference at the halfway point of the precessional cycle. It is with this sky position "opportunity" that I believe the Sphinx and Pyramids were built in part to commemorate, though not at the same time. I suggest that the Sphinx was built first one precessional cycle earlier when the sky was the same, during the period known as Zep Tepi. That is calculated by adding the value of a precessional cycle to the year 10,450 bce as follows; 10,450 + 25,920 = 36,370.
Therefore, I believe the Sphinx was built first in the year 36,370 bce when Orion sat at nadir in the sky as seen from Giza and the sun rose in the House of Leo constellation during the spring equinox period. The Sphinx would have been there ALREADY during the period some date the biblical flood and would account for the heavy water erosion found on the Sphinx's torso. After the flood period (10,900 bce) the completion of the long count precessional cycle occurred again in the year 10,450 bce, which is when I believe the Giza pyramids were built implementing sacred geometry in relation to the pre-existing Sphinx using solar references for size and placement of the 4 major seasonal angles of summer solstice, winter solstice, spring and fall equinoxes. So Giza among other purposes like science and geometric data recording, was a major time keeping centre for both the long count of precession, annual count for quarterly seasons, and shadow play for day and hour time keeping. I am also wondering if the Great Pyramid shafts are not referencing Earth tilt change over the 41,000 year cycle, though need to look into that still. At any rate I can see time referencing and recording stamped all over Giza.
This solar influenced theme at Giza is also tied into Nazca, Caral and Sacsayhauman along the ancient equator that extends to Easter Island, which in turn is due south of the Montana Megaliths. The Montana Megaliths also connect via the Ryder Line that matches the day/night terminator angle from Nazca north, bisecting the ancient equator. This interlinking all shows signs of solar reference. I suggest that is by design rather than random chance.
When examining Amber's Compass through this astronomical filter, orienting north first and then other cardinal points in an overlay of the Amber's Compass site, measurable angles became apparent. When looking at the menhir angle in relation to the circle circumference and other rocks in the grouping, they matched the offsets of the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn, which are purely sun related. This offset between the two "tropic" lines would be 23.44° X 2 = 46.88° (rounded to 47°). Helena, Montana sits at 46.35'44.9" north latitude. Virtually the same latitude distance.
This indicates then that Amber's Compass appears to be a sun movement calendar marking the sun's progression and regression along the horizon throughout the year with rocks placed in alignment to mark the contact points of the solstices and equinoxes at horizon level. In addition to that, the offset central menhirs are tilted in progressive angles. Is this a natural formation resulting from geological influences or are they deliberately tipped? If artificially positioned they may be placed on specific angles to record the following data; to mark the zenith points of the sun at noon on the winter solstice, spring/fall equinoxes and summer solstice to coincide with the horizon markers so observers have a left/right and up/down grid reference for sun positions at these key times. Another thought too, if artificially placed on these tilted angles, is that these tipped menhirs if not marking the sun, are marking the extent of sky change of a specific constellation for the processional long count as we see with Orion at Giza, though here in Montana, I believe it would be the constellation Aquila being addressed (the Eagle aka Thunderbird). To the north side of the menhirs is a giant half circle stone, which I believe is associated with the menhirs acting like a giant sun dial.
Included is a photo of the tipped menhirs as well as another showing the possible sun dial purpose. Time consuming groundwork is being undertaken in several stages so once numbers become available a clearer picture of what may hold true or not will develop. Exciting to say the least.
As these sites are interlinked as non official grid lines show, so too would be design orientation features, more so if based from a travelling ancient builder race doing the initial site selections and grid work which I believe to be INITIALLY DETERMINED BY THE SUN AND NIGHT SKY. It is the MOST stable constant for time keeping which is the basis one would draw upon when establishing either a stationary urban centre or nomadic system reliant on survival needs for dealing with climatic change which these temperate zone experience.
The annual renewal of the fauna and flora fitting PERFECTLY in with the birth/death/rebirth motif I strongly believe the Montana Megaliths and other ancient sites are ultimately paying homage to. The Phoenix, rising from the ashes, live and die in cyclic fashion, seen as Aquila (when applicable) at night and the sun by day, traversing the sky from east to west.
Additional comments with each photo.
Cheers!
=======================
This is a lengthy post, but worth reading through if you are interested in the Montana Megaliths.
Awhile ago Julie Ryder posted an overhead view of what is termed Amber's Compass. A photo of an area showing a crest of a hill with randomly scattered rocks. Is there something actually there reconfigured by an ancient civilization, or Nature's work that coincidentally looks like something?
Not proven one way or the other scientifically as of yet, it is left up to us to see if there is anything to see at all. The first photo shows the image in question. Can YOU see anything?
When you look at ancient sites long enough you begin to see similarities between them. Mainly in orientation to horizon points as well as construction design.
Are we to believe that each individual global civilization in the beginning all decided to undertake a building style unbeknownst of each other, such as dolmen construction, pyramid building, ziggurats and the like, or does it make more sense that a civilization already well versed in such technique travelled around the globe introducing their science and technology to pockets of civilizations encountered?The latter makes more sense to me.
Following along with Andrew Barker's multi tiered construction phases whereby initial building takes place at specific sites and then followup generations tweak and refurbish those sites to "modernize" them for their own societal needs makes sense. We do that today when we tear down structures to rebuild on the same footprint, or alter existing structures. So why wouldn't have ancient cultures?
I am going to cover a few areas in this post which to me when looked at with an open mind and use of an astronomical filter makes sense. The concept of time to the ancients would be as important to them as it is to us. Clues as to when to plant, nurture and harvest crops, rising waters, etc., being calculable. Preparation for off seasons in areas where climatic change in temperate climates necessitated the need for storing goods as we as a species became less nomadic and more domesticated into urban centers adding farming and grain growth as well as hunting and gathering to our skill levels for survival.
How or why the three earliest civilization's ALL settled on the 30° north parallel based on the phi formula? By chance, terrain, design, or combination of some or all of those? Or follow up civilizations, which dates for their existence get pushed back even farther than currently thought? We are aware of the cradle of civilization and the Fertile Crescent. The out of Africa theory, now challenged by the out of Australia theory, the populating of the America's and DNA migration tracing, etc.
It appears that what has been written will be rewritten and if need be, rightly so.
I feel a 30,000 year old date for some parts of the Montana Megaliths is right on que. It would fit in nicely with the time period I believe was known by the Ancient Egyptians as Zep Tepi. I believe that that period was tied to precession of the Earth and a perfect start/stop point for recording that 25,920 year long count, made available in the year 10,450 bce. Included in the photos is a diagram showing the view of the sky as seen from Giza/Cairo in that year. You can see that the constellation Orion is at nadir (lowest point in the sky it will reach before moving back up). As a perfect opportunity to be used as a time recording start point, the constellation will begin to move upward for the next 12,960 years. Reaching it's zenith position at the halfway point of the 25,920 year processional cycle, at which time it begins to move back down again in cyclic fashion.
When using this constellation as seen at Giza (known as the navel of the Earth's land mass), someone was aware of that local's significant meaning and thus provided for a good location for time keeping measures. The sky therefore from a given locale would look exactly the same orientation every 25,920 years, changing ever so slightly by 2.4° of cyclic axial tilt every 41,000 years. So in other words the Earth is not only rocking it is also swaying on it's axis simultaneously as it orbits the sun. Something I believe we might see as a result of being hit by a comet or asteroid at one time, disrupting an otherwise stable spin from a fixed axial point.
The diagram showing Orion at it's nadir point as seen from Giza in 10,450 bce is accompanied by another showing it at it's zenith in 2510 ce so you can see the difference at the halfway point of the precessional cycle. It is with this sky position "opportunity" that I believe the Sphinx and Pyramids were built in part to commemorate, though not at the same time. I suggest that the Sphinx was built first one precessional cycle earlier when the sky was the same, during the period known as Zep Tepi. That is calculated by adding the value of a precessional cycle to the year 10,450 bce as follows; 10,450 + 25,920 = 36,370.
Therefore, I believe the Sphinx was built first in the year 36,370 bce when Orion sat at nadir in the sky as seen from Giza and the sun rose in the House of Leo constellation during the spring equinox period. The Sphinx would have been there ALREADY during the period some date the biblical flood and would account for the heavy water erosion found on the Sphinx's torso. After the flood period (10,900 bce) the completion of the long count precessional cycle occurred again in the year 10,450 bce, which is when I believe the Giza pyramids were built implementing sacred geometry in relation to the pre-existing Sphinx using solar references for size and placement of the 4 major seasonal angles of summer solstice, winter solstice, spring and fall equinoxes. So Giza among other purposes like science and geometric data recording, was a major time keeping centre for both the long count of precession, annual count for quarterly seasons, and shadow play for day and hour time keeping. I am also wondering if the Great Pyramid shafts are not referencing Earth tilt change over the 41,000 year cycle, though need to look into that still. At any rate I can see time referencing and recording stamped all over Giza.
This solar influenced theme at Giza is also tied into Nazca, Caral and Sacsayhauman along the ancient equator that extends to Easter Island, which in turn is due south of the Montana Megaliths. The Montana Megaliths also connect via the Ryder Line that matches the day/night terminator angle from Nazca north, bisecting the ancient equator. This interlinking all shows signs of solar reference. I suggest that is by design rather than random chance.
When examining Amber's Compass through this astronomical filter, orienting north first and then other cardinal points in an overlay of the Amber's Compass site, measurable angles became apparent. When looking at the menhir angle in relation to the circle circumference and other rocks in the grouping, they matched the offsets of the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn, which are purely sun related. This offset between the two "tropic" lines would be 23.44° X 2 = 46.88° (rounded to 47°). Helena, Montana sits at 46.35'44.9" north latitude. Virtually the same latitude distance.
This indicates then that Amber's Compass appears to be a sun movement calendar marking the sun's progression and regression along the horizon throughout the year with rocks placed in alignment to mark the contact points of the solstices and equinoxes at horizon level. In addition to that, the offset central menhirs are tilted in progressive angles. Is this a natural formation resulting from geological influences or are they deliberately tipped? If artificially positioned they may be placed on specific angles to record the following data; to mark the zenith points of the sun at noon on the winter solstice, spring/fall equinoxes and summer solstice to coincide with the horizon markers so observers have a left/right and up/down grid reference for sun positions at these key times. Another thought too, if artificially placed on these tilted angles, is that these tipped menhirs if not marking the sun, are marking the extent of sky change of a specific constellation for the processional long count as we see with Orion at Giza, though here in Montana, I believe it would be the constellation Aquila being addressed (the Eagle aka Thunderbird). To the north side of the menhirs is a giant half circle stone, which I believe is associated with the menhirs acting like a giant sun dial.
Included is a photo of the tipped menhirs as well as another showing the possible sun dial purpose. Time consuming groundwork is being undertaken in several stages so once numbers become available a clearer picture of what may hold true or not will develop. Exciting to say the least.
As these sites are interlinked as non official grid lines show, so too would be design orientation features, more so if based from a travelling ancient builder race doing the initial site selections and grid work which I believe to be INITIALLY DETERMINED BY THE SUN AND NIGHT SKY. It is the MOST stable constant for time keeping which is the basis one would draw upon when establishing either a stationary urban centre or nomadic system reliant on survival needs for dealing with climatic change which these temperate zone experience.
The annual renewal of the fauna and flora fitting PERFECTLY in with the birth/death/rebirth motif I strongly believe the Montana Megaliths and other ancient sites are ultimately paying homage to. The Phoenix, rising from the ashes, live and die in cyclic fashion, seen as Aquila (when applicable) at night and the sun by day, traversing the sky from east to west.
Additional comments with each photo.
Cheers!
Michael Pell HAS DONE IT AGAIN
October 1. 2024
For several years Michael has been writing about the astroarchaeology of the Montana Megaliths. This is his latest contribution:
"What jumps out here is your comment that a Blackfoot elder says the Thunderbird represents south. From my own research and suggested ideas based on astronomical considerations I personally equate the Thunderbird with the constellation Aquila (the Eagle).
"From the MM location Aquila would transit the sky from east to west reaching zenith due south. Here Aquila as a Thunderbird might also be acquainted as a Phoenix rising out of the fire (sun) in the east to die each day in the west only to be reborn again the following day.
"As it is my belief the MM is a homage in part to the life/death/rebirth cycle as a Phoenix bird I have asked is it a coincidence the city Phoenix sits due south of the MM on the 33 parallel and that that parallel also shares a Phoenix bird at Warner Springs to its west, looking much like the Phoenix/Eagle amphitheater in the MM?
"Also I am currently reading about the Bennu bird in Alford’s excellent book “When The Gods Came Down” that may correlate with the Bennu bird we find in Egypt.
"As we have shown a tie between the Ryder Line from the MM in Montana to Nazca and the ancient Equator from Nazca to Giza, it seems to all be connected, and in my opinion from a solar/astronomical perspective as seen from Earth."
This is the illustration that Michael posted with this comment.
This winter one of my goals is to organize and re-write my website so that it is easier to reference.
FB post that Michael is referencing:
https://www.facebook.com/julie.ryder.5095/posts/8391938124255031
October 1. 2024
For several years Michael has been writing about the astroarchaeology of the Montana Megaliths. This is his latest contribution:
"What jumps out here is your comment that a Blackfoot elder says the Thunderbird represents south. From my own research and suggested ideas based on astronomical considerations I personally equate the Thunderbird with the constellation Aquila (the Eagle).
"From the MM location Aquila would transit the sky from east to west reaching zenith due south. Here Aquila as a Thunderbird might also be acquainted as a Phoenix rising out of the fire (sun) in the east to die each day in the west only to be reborn again the following day.
"As it is my belief the MM is a homage in part to the life/death/rebirth cycle as a Phoenix bird I have asked is it a coincidence the city Phoenix sits due south of the MM on the 33 parallel and that that parallel also shares a Phoenix bird at Warner Springs to its west, looking much like the Phoenix/Eagle amphitheater in the MM?
"Also I am currently reading about the Bennu bird in Alford’s excellent book “When The Gods Came Down” that may correlate with the Bennu bird we find in Egypt.
"As we have shown a tie between the Ryder Line from the MM in Montana to Nazca and the ancient Equator from Nazca to Giza, it seems to all be connected, and in my opinion from a solar/astronomical perspective as seen from Earth."
This is the illustration that Michael posted with this comment.
This winter one of my goals is to organize and re-write my website so that it is easier to reference.
FB post that Michael is referencing:
https://www.facebook.com/julie.ryder.5095/posts/8391938124255031
When looking for patterns to explore when repeat values show up numerically, I found the following of interest, supporting known solar values in relation to the Earth and it’s changing axis angle. The following is based on Julie Ryder’s work initially.
Earlier we showed an interesting calculation that shows a potential connection between Helena, Montana (relative area hosting the Montana Megaliths) and Giza, using axial change values and PHI.
I’ll put an excerpt from an earlier post regarding that as follows and then add a new observation which may lend credence to these structural locations being solar determined.
First, the excerpt dealing with the Montana/Giza connection;
[quote]
“Now as our planet wobbles and changes our axial tilt by 2.4° and back again over 41,000 years, we currently sit around 23.3/23.4° of axial tilt.
The wobble occurs between a 22.1°-24.5° change or in other words a 2.4° sway back and forth difference over that time. Half of that or the midway point is 1.2° of which would be 23.3°, roughly the axial tilt we are at currently.
I began to think if Giza is sitting at 30°N at present might it be sitting at a greater and shallower latitude over time by that 2.4° change. If so and it is at 30° at the mid point of the sway as we move to a less severe tilt toward 22.1°, would indicate it may be sitting eventually at 28.8° rather than 30° as of now, in relation to the Sun. With 1.2° of tilt to still be experienced over the next 10,000 years we subtract 1.2° from 30° to arrive at 28.8° (30 - 1.2 = 28.8°)
I called up a PHI calculating app to see what a PHI value 28.8 would be. According to the app the PHI value for 28.8 would be as follows;
28.8/1.618 = 17.79
28.8 + 17.79 = 46.59
That would indicate a latitude of 46.59°
Now as we have seen a solar based tie between Montana and the Caral, Nazca and Sacsayhuaman region from a north/south perspective and in turn a connection between the Nazca region and Giza (east/west) via the so called ancient equator, how might PHI relate if at all?
We have shown the Giza, Sumer, Indus Valley PHI relationship in relation to the landmass but does this Nazca region hub between Nazca/Giza and Nazca/Montana share the implementation of PHI as well?
Using the adjusted axial tilt of 28.8° for Giza as Earth moves toward a less tilted axis of 22.1° over the next 10,000 years we calculated the PHI value to be 46.59° shown above.
When we look at Helena’s latitude in Montana, subject to the source as they vary slightly depending on what is used, I came across this data.
Helena hosts the region of the Montana Megaliths spread around the region, sits at around a 46.589° N latitude. We round 46.589° up to 46.59° which matches perfectly to the PHI value of Giza when Earth’s axis tilt is at it’s shallowest.”
[unquote]
To this line of thinking we introduce the value of 33 in conjunction to the north/south Ryder line connecting Helena, Montana with the east /west ancient equator passing through the Sacsayhuaman region to Giza.
We have addressed the importance of 33 in previous posts.
On a side note is it a coincidence that the setting Sun on the equinoxes at Helena, Montana sets at 43.4° north latitude and the combined latitudinal difference between Sacsayhuaman (13.5° S added to Giza 29.79° N equals 43.29°)? Virtually the same as the Helena equinox latitude.
When we subtract Sacsayhuaman’s latitude of 13.5° S from Helena’s latitude of 46.5 we get the following;
46.5° - 13.5° = 33°
In Helena we find the Eagle Amphitheatre, or as one might think, Phoenix bird.
Due south the city of Phoenix is located (due south is the zenith position of anything crossing the sky astronomically). Interestingly the city sits on the 33° parallel.
To the west of Phoenix in Warner Springs, ALSO on the 33° parallel is another Phoenix bird.
Both Phoenix birds possibly could be tracking the constellation Aquila (the Eagle) as it rises (born) in the east and sets (dies) in the west to be born again (rise from the ashes) each day.
That these values of Giza, Sacsayhuaman and Montana sharing solar values and angles in their structural orientations and relationships to each other can be seen in the math.
Whether those values are actually based on and indicating those values from the solar perspective is open to debate.
Earlier we showed an interesting calculation that shows a potential connection between Helena, Montana (relative area hosting the Montana Megaliths) and Giza, using axial change values and PHI.
I’ll put an excerpt from an earlier post regarding that as follows and then add a new observation which may lend credence to these structural locations being solar determined.
First, the excerpt dealing with the Montana/Giza connection;
[quote]
“Now as our planet wobbles and changes our axial tilt by 2.4° and back again over 41,000 years, we currently sit around 23.3/23.4° of axial tilt.
The wobble occurs between a 22.1°-24.5° change or in other words a 2.4° sway back and forth difference over that time. Half of that or the midway point is 1.2° of which would be 23.3°, roughly the axial tilt we are at currently.
I began to think if Giza is sitting at 30°N at present might it be sitting at a greater and shallower latitude over time by that 2.4° change. If so and it is at 30° at the mid point of the sway as we move to a less severe tilt toward 22.1°, would indicate it may be sitting eventually at 28.8° rather than 30° as of now, in relation to the Sun. With 1.2° of tilt to still be experienced over the next 10,000 years we subtract 1.2° from 30° to arrive at 28.8° (30 - 1.2 = 28.8°)
I called up a PHI calculating app to see what a PHI value 28.8 would be. According to the app the PHI value for 28.8 would be as follows;
28.8/1.618 = 17.79
28.8 + 17.79 = 46.59
That would indicate a latitude of 46.59°
Now as we have seen a solar based tie between Montana and the Caral, Nazca and Sacsayhuaman region from a north/south perspective and in turn a connection between the Nazca region and Giza (east/west) via the so called ancient equator, how might PHI relate if at all?
We have shown the Giza, Sumer, Indus Valley PHI relationship in relation to the landmass but does this Nazca region hub between Nazca/Giza and Nazca/Montana share the implementation of PHI as well?
Using the adjusted axial tilt of 28.8° for Giza as Earth moves toward a less tilted axis of 22.1° over the next 10,000 years we calculated the PHI value to be 46.59° shown above.
When we look at Helena’s latitude in Montana, subject to the source as they vary slightly depending on what is used, I came across this data.
Helena hosts the region of the Montana Megaliths spread around the region, sits at around a 46.589° N latitude. We round 46.589° up to 46.59° which matches perfectly to the PHI value of Giza when Earth’s axis tilt is at it’s shallowest.”
[unquote]
To this line of thinking we introduce the value of 33 in conjunction to the north/south Ryder line connecting Helena, Montana with the east /west ancient equator passing through the Sacsayhuaman region to Giza.
We have addressed the importance of 33 in previous posts.
On a side note is it a coincidence that the setting Sun on the equinoxes at Helena, Montana sets at 43.4° north latitude and the combined latitudinal difference between Sacsayhuaman (13.5° S added to Giza 29.79° N equals 43.29°)? Virtually the same as the Helena equinox latitude.
When we subtract Sacsayhuaman’s latitude of 13.5° S from Helena’s latitude of 46.5 we get the following;
46.5° - 13.5° = 33°
In Helena we find the Eagle Amphitheatre, or as one might think, Phoenix bird.
Due south the city of Phoenix is located (due south is the zenith position of anything crossing the sky astronomically). Interestingly the city sits on the 33° parallel.
To the west of Phoenix in Warner Springs, ALSO on the 33° parallel is another Phoenix bird.
Both Phoenix birds possibly could be tracking the constellation Aquila (the Eagle) as it rises (born) in the east and sets (dies) in the west to be born again (rise from the ashes) each day.
That these values of Giza, Sacsayhuaman and Montana sharing solar values and angles in their structural orientations and relationships to each other can be seen in the math.
Whether those values are actually based on and indicating those values from the solar perspective is open to debate.
Michael Pell writes:
Julie, I am finding the collective sum of all the many smaller parts opens the doors to new ways to view items from the past.
Ideas come and go with varied interpretations but repetition of numbers in various usages is telling us something, should we choose to listen.
Julie, I am finding the collective sum of all the many smaller parts opens the doors to new ways to view items from the past.
Ideas come and go with varied interpretations but repetition of numbers in various usages is telling us something, should we choose to listen.
Michael Pell
I did an experiment shared here previously based on Julie’s parabolic sound diagram in comparison to the Giza pyramid overhead offset structural orientation as seen in the diagram below. If connected I wonder if there is something located at Giza underground that corresponds to where the focal point would be?
Also of interest is the discussed angles of 13° and 33° we often see (as values) in ancient text or imagery.
As we know and have discussed, 33° is the latitude of Phoenix, connected to Helena on a longitudinal line and when we add the 13 to the 33 results in 46, very close to the MM latitudinal area 46+° north.
I did an experiment shared here previously based on Julie’s parabolic sound diagram in comparison to the Giza pyramid overhead offset structural orientation as seen in the diagram below. If connected I wonder if there is something located at Giza underground that corresponds to where the focal point would be?
Also of interest is the discussed angles of 13° and 33° we often see (as values) in ancient text or imagery.
As we know and have discussed, 33° is the latitude of Phoenix, connected to Helena on a longitudinal line and when we add the 13 to the 33 results in 46, very close to the MM latitudinal area 46+° north.
MICHAEL PELL PRESENTS
For several years now Michael Pell has analysed the photos and information we have presented at the Montana Megaliths, USA and offered graphics, ideas, theories and astounding correlations and insights to the growing body of knowledge.
Michael Pell writes, "While Julie Ryder and her ground crew have the luxury of exploring the Montana Megaliths in person with boots on the ground and sharing their findings, others like myself work remotely with the data she and they uncover.
The more eyes looking at these structures and their general layout, the better chance of uncovering what this complex is, why it exists and when it may have been built.
Was it an all at once construction site or one developed over millennia?
I have been following Julie’s posting for around five or so years to date and at times I can see familiarity of her offerings with other like styled or themed global sites. Is there a connection? Evidence perhaps of a globally travelling “builder race” that went around building these sites or teaching and assisting any local clans of people inhabiting the area at the time?
The commonality of design suggest a possibility such was the case. What are the odds that a building style of such similarity between civilizations would happen on a global scale between civilizations thought to have no contact with each other around the same time period?
In my own area of interest of paleoastronomy and archeoastronomy I can see a link between sky and ground. That link between the “as above, so below” phrase we hear. I encourage Julie and her crew to take note of compass directions and upward angles objects and structures are facing, for the resulting numbers just may be part of the clues to uncover the narrative behind the Montana Megaliths.
I am thoroughly convinced the MM site and complex is overall a solar based one, chosen to mirror sun related events recorded in the ground placement of structures. I don’t know it as a fact, but running tests against sun known values, often the math fits with what we see on the ground there. It is grounds for consideration in the meanwhile.
Michael Pell writes, "While Julie Ryder and her ground crew have the luxury of exploring the Montana Megaliths in person with boots on the ground and sharing their findings, others like myself work remotely with the data she and they uncover.
The more eyes looking at these structures and their general layout, the better chance of uncovering what this complex is, why it exists and when it may have been built.
Was it an all at once construction site or one developed over millennia?
I have been following Julie’s posting for around five or so years to date and at times I can see familiarity of her offerings with other like styled or themed global sites. Is there a connection? Evidence perhaps of a globally travelling “builder race” that went around building these sites or teaching and assisting any local clans of people inhabiting the area at the time?
The commonality of design suggest a possibility such was the case. What are the odds that a building style of such similarity between civilizations would happen on a global scale between civilizations thought to have no contact with each other around the same time period?
In my own area of interest of paleoastronomy and archeoastronomy I can see a link between sky and ground. That link between the “as above, so below” phrase we hear. I encourage Julie and her crew to take note of compass directions and upward angles objects and structures are facing, for the resulting numbers just may be part of the clues to uncover the narrative behind the Montana Megaliths.
I am thoroughly convinced the MM site and complex is overall a solar based one, chosen to mirror sun related events recorded in the ground placement of structures. I don’t know it as a fact, but running tests against sun known values, often the math fits with what we see on the ground there. It is grounds for consideration in the meanwhile.
The Helena region where the MMs generally reside I feel was chosen deliberately. Coming in at around 47° north latitude rounded off. Currently at 46.59° north. When we account for the 2.4° axial change between 22.1° and 24.5° over a 40,000/41,000 year period will cause latitudinal grid shifting in surface locations in relation to the Sun’s location over the millennia. Knowing what the true latitude the MM region was at time of construction could show the degree of axial tilt the Earth was experiencing then and resulting math and angles would fall in accordingly. Once true values are known, matching physical structures’ math results to those values would be a strong indicator if not outright proof the sun and sky placements of constellations or star groups was the canvas being mimicked on the ground, or not.
For now as we don’t have the exact mathematical values, ball park figures combined with known axial tilt variance must suffice. My hunch is it will prove to match.
I came across the following diagram. It shows relative sun tracking paths between the winter solstice, vernal (spring) and autumnal (fall) equinoxes and winter solstice across the sky as seen from a location in Sicily.
What is interesting are the values associated with each in relation to each other. As listed they equal the degree of difference we see on the man made grid system we draw on our globe such as the tropics of Cancer, Capricorn and the equator. On a map the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn sit 23.5° above and below the equator. Add those values together 23.5° + 23.5° = 47°.
Now looking at the diagram below we see the winter solstice sun tracking at 30° and the summer solstice sun tracking at 77° high in the sky. When we subtract the lower value from the higher value we get 77° - 30° = 47°, matching with the generally known Earth grid latitude values, showing clearly they are sun related.
That 47° difference in latitude is exactly matching Helena’s current latitude above our equator give or take a fraction of a degree which is allowable in my opinion as a result of axial tilt sway. When comparing Helena’s location on the globe with other sites based on what I call the Ryder line and the so called ancient equator we have shown on Julie’s page elsewhere, it is clear to me that all of these places were developed as close as possible to a Sun/sky relationship as seen from the ground during the time of each of their construction. The sky and ground are slow to change but considered mainly constant and relatively stable for a basis for local mapping and reference points.
It is here I believe the MMs are one of those key sun related reference points and was so developed as a record of conditions experienced at time of construction visible between that region, the sky and relationship on the globe as a whole. The more I examine things, the sun is the main player, moon secondly and constellations following up with the circumpolar constellation Draco playing roles of importance as each is constant and built around the changing axial point points our planet’s northern pole points to over time, currently at Polaris in Ursa Minor.
The sun tracking diagram that the latitudinal difference matches Helena’s latitude. Coincidence?"
Michael Pell: Star Alignments at the Sumer Complex
I posted a short YouTube video about Inanna and the Sumer Complex in January, 2023. Several relevant comments by Michael Pell and his friends on the Missun' Lynx group site were highly compelling:
Statue of Inanna on the Montana Megaliths YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPM6iH_oaAI
Statue of Inanna on the Montana Megaliths YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPM6iH_oaAI
Statue of Inanna at the Sumer Complex
|
Graphic of star alignments by Michael Pell
|
Michael Pell begins the conversation:
"In addition to what you are mentioning I found this sky alignment which might also fit.
Not sure of directions in the original photo but by looking at sun light and shadows it appears this alignment may be in a south/north alignment.
With Inanna on the southern side of the alignment moving to the Sphinx structure to the north and the “dragon king” in the middle.
This could be seen as Inanna’s gaze passing through the middle structure toward the one to her right.
In order for the following idea to work the central “dragon king” might be considered a bear that is flanked by a female on the left and the dragon Sphinx on the right when looking at the alignment.
With that idea in mind when looking at a sky map we see the constellation Virgo (female) looking at Draco through Ursa Major.
Draco being the dominant circumpolar constellation that houses the true axial point our planet points to if the axis was not wobbling. Draco also hosts the pole star for a part of the precessional cycle.
Virgo (as a female constellation) here called Inanna looking toward the area housing our planet’s axial path, which is currently pointing toward the star Polaris as “host pole star”.
The dragon Sphinx being the circumpolar region of importance and the central “dragon king” could be a bear representing Ursa Major.
This diagram shows the three constellation alignment of Virgo, Ursa Major and Draco.
"In addition to what you are mentioning I found this sky alignment which might also fit.
Not sure of directions in the original photo but by looking at sun light and shadows it appears this alignment may be in a south/north alignment.
With Inanna on the southern side of the alignment moving to the Sphinx structure to the north and the “dragon king” in the middle.
This could be seen as Inanna’s gaze passing through the middle structure toward the one to her right.
In order for the following idea to work the central “dragon king” might be considered a bear that is flanked by a female on the left and the dragon Sphinx on the right when looking at the alignment.
With that idea in mind when looking at a sky map we see the constellation Virgo (female) looking at Draco through Ursa Major.
Draco being the dominant circumpolar constellation that houses the true axial point our planet points to if the axis was not wobbling. Draco also hosts the pole star for a part of the precessional cycle.
Virgo (as a female constellation) here called Inanna looking toward the area housing our planet’s axial path, which is currently pointing toward the star Polaris as “host pole star”.
The dragon Sphinx being the circumpolar region of importance and the central “dragon king” could be a bear representing Ursa Major.
This diagram shows the three constellation alignment of Virgo, Ursa Major and Draco.
The changing pole star axis and years in effect in light coloured circle. Note the constellation Draco is always contained within the circle.
|
General changing pole star circle as experienced by northern hemisphere sky. Seen as the darker circle between Polaris and Vega.
|
|
|
The concept of these three figures emulating sky constellations makes more sense if the Cygnus grouping found at Montana proves to be doing the same.
That the figures on the ground align with constellations in the order they appear in the sky where Cygnus is located, and again here causes me to believe that the Montana megalithic region is mirroring sky conditions as would be experienced there while looking up. That if true, other ground based structures may be also present elsewhere to be discovered creating a rock based panorama of the celestial vista above. The Cygnus group of constellations that appears to match ground structures at MM. |
Michael Pell continues: Ninmah fits in nicely. I am just using the names Julie posted in her OP but it is the fertile female symbology which is important. A description of Ninmah from the Internet, which would also go well with the image at Montana: Mother Goddess (Ninmah, Nintud/r, Belet-ili)
http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/amgg/listofdeities/mothergoddess/index.html?fbclid=IwAR2ThHb6X3uaJXSCx2dmXV9dsoBJu5x3yUSZvsLy-arsLWucKufkF5wMd5E
http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/amgg/listofdeities/mothergoddess/index.html?fbclid=IwAR2ThHb6X3uaJXSCx2dmXV9dsoBJu5x3yUSZvsLy-arsLWucKufkF5wMd5E
|
Interesting in that Helena, Montana’s co-ordinates are listed as;
Helena co-ordinates: 46° 35' 21" N / 112° 2' 21" W Then the sky counterpart of the old pole star Tau Herculis is listed with a declination of; 46° 18′ 48.1123″ Almost identical. A bit about the Tau symbol that Al has mentioned via alchemy; Tau /ˈtɔː, ˈtaʊ/ is the 19th letter of the Greek alphabet, representing the voiceless dental ... In ancient times, tau was used as a symbol for life or resurrection, ...As part of the ankh and cross of crucifixion. |
|
Michel Pell shows astronomical alignments of the
features in the MM
features in the MM
There is an astronomical alignment between bird (avian), snake (dragon) and female constellations in the northern hemisphere sky.
In this diagram, viewing along the red line from the side would have two candidates for avian references either in Cygnus (the swan) or Aquila (the eagle) then circumpolar Draco (snake/dragon) and on the bottom, Virgo (the maiden).
In this diagram, viewing along the red line from the side would have two candidates for avian references either in Cygnus (the swan) or Aquila (the eagle) then circumpolar Draco (snake/dragon) and on the bottom, Virgo (the maiden).
On March 23, 2023 Michael Pell posted:
I took the opportunity to watch the video Julie Ryder had shared here of her experiences on the Missouri River showing many interesting structures and formations along each bank.
Well done Julie!
To coincide with her commentary provides the opportunity to repost some additional interesting points we have discussed earlier that new group members may not be aware of but might lend something of importance to the conversation if it is connected.
It deals with the river’s trajectory and generalized location sharing a common theme that ties in both longitudinally and latitudinally from the Helena location.
To rehash then let us consider also the following.
Another interesting shape is that of an avian nature when viewed from above. As the Missouri River has cut into the landscape to create somewhat the look of an Eagle spreading it’s wings.
The Eagle/Aquila/Phoenix theme is seen throughout this region. We have seen the Eagle amphitheatre here that lines up longitudinally with the city of Phoenix due south of it. In turn the city of Phoenix also lines up latitudinally along the 33rd north latitude with another similar Eagle rock formation to the west of it.
As if both Eagle formations were directing attention as they meet perpendicularly where Phoenix (another avian theme) is located. Might that be a reason why the site was developed?
I feel all these are solar based. We have shown how Helena sitting at 46°+/47° is a solar number, also found at Giza. We know the solar determined Tropic of Cancer sits at 23.5° north latitude. 23.5° is exactly half of 47°.
Coincidence?
If we split the difference of the Helena latitude and call it roughly 46.5° and then subtract it from the Phoenix latitude of 33° it results as follows;
46.5° - 33° = 13.5°
When we divide 13.5° into another well known solar figure of 19.5° it results as follows;
19.5°/13.5°= 1.44
*Note 13.5 and 1.44 equate to 9 (1+4+4=9, 1+3+5=9)
We see 33 and 144 in ancient writing references numerous times that we have discussed previously.
When looking at the Warner Springs Eagle longitude that shares the Phoenix latitude of 33° we see it is located at 116.6. When we subtract the Phoenix longitude 112.0 from it results as;
116.6 - 112.0 = 4.6
Now when subtracting the solar related Tropic of Cancer latitude from the Phoenix/Warner Spring latitude we find it results in a value of 9.5.
33°-23.5°= 9.5°
Half of that 9.5 value is 4.75 which is very close to the difference in longitude between Phoenix and the Warner Spring eagle of 4.6.
As well as when we multiply 4.6 by 3 = 13.8
That 13.8 is very close to the difference in latitude between Helena region in Montana from Phoenix in Arizona along the 112 longitude.
Helena at 46°+/47° minus Phoenix latitude of 33° = 13.5°/14° rounded to 13.75°.
May all be a coincidence but I can see a purposeful grid based on solar values forming that are connected.
I took the opportunity to watch the video Julie Ryder had shared here of her experiences on the Missouri River showing many interesting structures and formations along each bank.
Well done Julie!
To coincide with her commentary provides the opportunity to repost some additional interesting points we have discussed earlier that new group members may not be aware of but might lend something of importance to the conversation if it is connected.
It deals with the river’s trajectory and generalized location sharing a common theme that ties in both longitudinally and latitudinally from the Helena location.
To rehash then let us consider also the following.
Another interesting shape is that of an avian nature when viewed from above. As the Missouri River has cut into the landscape to create somewhat the look of an Eagle spreading it’s wings.
The Eagle/Aquila/Phoenix theme is seen throughout this region. We have seen the Eagle amphitheatre here that lines up longitudinally with the city of Phoenix due south of it. In turn the city of Phoenix also lines up latitudinally along the 33rd north latitude with another similar Eagle rock formation to the west of it.
As if both Eagle formations were directing attention as they meet perpendicularly where Phoenix (another avian theme) is located. Might that be a reason why the site was developed?
I feel all these are solar based. We have shown how Helena sitting at 46°+/47° is a solar number, also found at Giza. We know the solar determined Tropic of Cancer sits at 23.5° north latitude. 23.5° is exactly half of 47°.
Coincidence?
If we split the difference of the Helena latitude and call it roughly 46.5° and then subtract it from the Phoenix latitude of 33° it results as follows;
46.5° - 33° = 13.5°
When we divide 13.5° into another well known solar figure of 19.5° it results as follows;
19.5°/13.5°= 1.44
*Note 13.5 and 1.44 equate to 9 (1+4+4=9, 1+3+5=9)
We see 33 and 144 in ancient writing references numerous times that we have discussed previously.
When looking at the Warner Springs Eagle longitude that shares the Phoenix latitude of 33° we see it is located at 116.6. When we subtract the Phoenix longitude 112.0 from it results as;
116.6 - 112.0 = 4.6
Now when subtracting the solar related Tropic of Cancer latitude from the Phoenix/Warner Spring latitude we find it results in a value of 9.5.
33°-23.5°= 9.5°
Half of that 9.5 value is 4.75 which is very close to the difference in longitude between Phoenix and the Warner Spring eagle of 4.6.
As well as when we multiply 4.6 by 3 = 13.8
That 13.8 is very close to the difference in latitude between Helena region in Montana from Phoenix in Arizona along the 112 longitude.
Helena at 46°+/47° minus Phoenix latitude of 33° = 13.5°/14° rounded to 13.75°.
May all be a coincidence but I can see a purposeful grid based on solar values forming that are connected.
Above the Missouri River across from the Dancing Giant Feet Complex an enigmatic fossilized draconian head is back to back with a more human long faced figure enclosed in a rectangular box. These walls are covered with faces of reptilian and human hybrids. The square hat and long face human Man in a Box reminds me of the Easter Island Moai Statues.
|
Michael Pell writes, "
Julie, yes as I can see relationships between the three sites mathematically as well as in themes (Phoenix). The use of numbers with solar references as well as average degree of Earth tilt appear to be embedded. That the Helena/Phoenix longitudinal line when extended in a southerly direction arrives in the vicinity of the closest land mass in the area, Easter Island is of interest. It is at this location the longitude crosses the so called ancient equator. Likewise another line from Helena to Nazca, Peru that I call the Ryder Line crosses the ancient equator also. That the Ryder Line matches the solar based Terminator Line during a part of the year is important. Both the Ryder Line from Helena to Peru and the longitudinal line from Helena to Easter Island would frame a measurable angled element. When looking at the statues on Easter Island, they appear to sit at a 23.5° angle, matching the mean average of Earth’s tilt. As well when comparing the (Graham) Hancock line toward the Sacsayhuaman region to the Helena/Nazca Ryder Line it appears to show a 19.5° angle that we see repeated also at Giza. All solar/Earth tilt numbers. Someone knew of this and appears to have recorded it by locations throughout the globe in relation to each other. The longitude between Helena and Easter Island. |
|
Shtreimel is Yiddish, and it refers to a specific type of fur hat that Hasidic Jewish men wear on Shabbat, Jewish holidays, and other festivities.
|
Michael Pell writes, "While examining the writings of old we consider the material to be a combination of mythical to accurate or actual events. Many angles to look from and consider.
"We read about gods, angels and more in religious perspectives. As I am one to believe many of these are based on past sky observations, rather than flesh and blood beings, much is related to deified stars and planets.
The research goes on.
"With that thought in mind it came to me to see if there might be a connection of these ancient writings to the annual meteor showers we experience. That these “fallen angels” might be describing the visual impact and interpretation of such an event in terms of understanding at the time of their scribing.
"As well, the background sky from that visual perspective where a given constellation seen as the origin of the event may be given more attention than other “quieter” constellations. Something to consider and I am looking forward to where this idea may lead."
"We read about gods, angels and more in religious perspectives. As I am one to believe many of these are based on past sky observations, rather than flesh and blood beings, much is related to deified stars and planets.
The research goes on.
"With that thought in mind it came to me to see if there might be a connection of these ancient writings to the annual meteor showers we experience. That these “fallen angels” might be describing the visual impact and interpretation of such an event in terms of understanding at the time of their scribing.
"As well, the background sky from that visual perspective where a given constellation seen as the origin of the event may be given more attention than other “quieter” constellations. Something to consider and I am looking forward to where this idea may lead."
In a comment on FB regarding this photo of Amber's Compass
Scott Hines wrote:
You will find that the mounds around the outside are constructed just like a battery. Conductive layer, then non conductive layer, and repeat. They are not complete circles, there is always an opening which indicates the direction Earth’s energy is flowing in from. The mound is constructed like a battery to store the Earths energy. The circular shape causes the energy to flow up into a Vortex. You will probably also find that the stones around the outside are alternating male and female stones? (Not the same type of stone). I suspect you know already know all of this .
The exact same thing exists at Mounds State Park in Indiana. There they used a snake like rock structure in the river to direct the river’s energy up into the mound making it even more powerful.
Same thing can be done anywhere along where a Ley Line crosses a mountain stream or River. They are often built where the river or stream makes a turn. The remnants of one can be viewed at Mounds State Park, Indiana.
Same thing can also be done where rivers flow down out of the mountains crossing a Ley Line as they flow into the ocean.
You can create your own energy.
Scott Hines wrote:
You will find that the mounds around the outside are constructed just like a battery. Conductive layer, then non conductive layer, and repeat. They are not complete circles, there is always an opening which indicates the direction Earth’s energy is flowing in from. The mound is constructed like a battery to store the Earths energy. The circular shape causes the energy to flow up into a Vortex. You will probably also find that the stones around the outside are alternating male and female stones? (Not the same type of stone). I suspect you know already know all of this .
The exact same thing exists at Mounds State Park in Indiana. There they used a snake like rock structure in the river to direct the river’s energy up into the mound making it even more powerful.
Same thing can be done anywhere along where a Ley Line crosses a mountain stream or River. They are often built where the river or stream makes a turn. The remnants of one can be viewed at Mounds State Park, Indiana.
Same thing can also be done where rivers flow down out of the mountains crossing a Ley Line as they flow into the ocean.
You can create your own energy.
On December 21, 2023 Michael Pell wrote:
(The White Animal Prophecies are) an interesting topic for sure. Not only in the phenomena but in how humanity reacts toward it in their belief systems.
Julie’s posting are of great interest and provide much food for thought.
She has put in the “miles” so to speak and I value her comments. Someone I am pleased to call a friend though we have never met in person. She has been kind in letting me comment on aspects of her work when using my “astronomy” filter without judgement. Some ideas click, some don’t, but she is not one to selfishly hold her research to herself. She is a gift in what she brings to the table and an honorable person.
I have been intrigued by these cases of white animals and how humanity interrelates with them from our perspective. Not sure if it is connected solely to albinism or if something else is at work here so leave the door open to any and all that may lend to the topic.
I found in Julie’s article you posted that many references do fit the astronomical filter if one is open minded to such ideas. The mention of “72 of their members” of the tribe is interesting. I am at the point now that anytime I see the number 72 it may be a clandestine way of addressing the Sun.
72 being a precessional number as we have discussed. Being the amount of years the Sun takes to move 1° through any of 12 houses of the zodiac. That each house assigned 30° of “sky” results in the Sun being hosted for 2,160 years per house (currently in Pisces) based on the Sun rising against during the vernal equinox. 2,160 in our current math equates to the converted value of 3,600 in the Sumerian sexagesimal system. What I believe to be a “shar”.
Also the mention of “ 12 original ancestors of which two are human” in Julie’s linked article matches zodiac symbology at key points of the Earth/Sun relationship during the Pisces ruling period (roughly years 0 - 2,160 ce). Those humanly constellations known as Virgo and Gemini.
During our current alignment with the Sun rising against Pisces at the vernal equinox when the Earth is on the opposite side of the Sun from the constellation we find also the two human constellations host the Sun per annum as follows;
With the Earth between Sun and Pisces we see Virgo as the autumnal equinox constellation.
With the Earth between Sun and Sagittarius we see Gemini hosting the Sun during the Summer Solstice.
Both “human” constellations (2) hosting the Sun (as seen from the Earth) during key solar related cardinal calendar points of the 12 constellations available. While not proving a correlation, definitely matching what is described in Julie’s article.
That invites me to wonder if there might be a deeper astronomical meaning behind the tribal organizational design setup.
Sun/Earth positional chart against zodiac constellations. Note the Sun rising against Pisces (a fish themed constellation) during the vernal equinox as seen from Earth and our current “age”. Coincides with the common fish symbol you see about.
I am currently thinking of studying the pantheons of ancient civilizations to check numerical values against astronomical considerations, which just might be telling as to what the “gods” are (or not).
Julie’s posting are of great interest and provide much food for thought.
She has put in the “miles” so to speak and I value her comments. Someone I am pleased to call a friend though we have never met in person. She has been kind in letting me comment on aspects of her work when using my “astronomy” filter without judgement. Some ideas click, some don’t, but she is not one to selfishly hold her research to herself. She is a gift in what she brings to the table and an honorable person.
I have been intrigued by these cases of white animals and how humanity interrelates with them from our perspective. Not sure if it is connected solely to albinism or if something else is at work here so leave the door open to any and all that may lend to the topic.
I found in Julie’s article you posted that many references do fit the astronomical filter if one is open minded to such ideas. The mention of “72 of their members” of the tribe is interesting. I am at the point now that anytime I see the number 72 it may be a clandestine way of addressing the Sun.
72 being a precessional number as we have discussed. Being the amount of years the Sun takes to move 1° through any of 12 houses of the zodiac. That each house assigned 30° of “sky” results in the Sun being hosted for 2,160 years per house (currently in Pisces) based on the Sun rising against during the vernal equinox. 2,160 in our current math equates to the converted value of 3,600 in the Sumerian sexagesimal system. What I believe to be a “shar”.
Also the mention of “ 12 original ancestors of which two are human” in Julie’s linked article matches zodiac symbology at key points of the Earth/Sun relationship during the Pisces ruling period (roughly years 0 - 2,160 ce). Those humanly constellations known as Virgo and Gemini.
During our current alignment with the Sun rising against Pisces at the vernal equinox when the Earth is on the opposite side of the Sun from the constellation we find also the two human constellations host the Sun per annum as follows;
With the Earth between Sun and Pisces we see Virgo as the autumnal equinox constellation.
With the Earth between Sun and Sagittarius we see Gemini hosting the Sun during the Summer Solstice.
Both “human” constellations (2) hosting the Sun (as seen from the Earth) during key solar related cardinal calendar points of the 12 constellations available. While not proving a correlation, definitely matching what is described in Julie’s article.
That invites me to wonder if there might be a deeper astronomical meaning behind the tribal organizational design setup.
Sun/Earth positional chart against zodiac constellations. Note the Sun rising against Pisces (a fish themed constellation) during the vernal equinox as seen from Earth and our current “age”. Coincides with the common fish symbol you see about.
I am currently thinking of studying the pantheons of ancient civilizations to check numerical values against astronomical considerations, which just might be telling as to what the “gods” are (or not).
Illustrations by Michael Pell
|
|
Michael Pell commented on January 1, 2024:
Showing the various terminator day/night angles as seen from space. Winter solstice position follows the Ryder Line and Dwaine’s map diagram.
Showing the various terminator day/night angles as seen from space. Winter solstice position follows the Ryder Line and Dwaine’s map diagram.
HORNED BULL TAURUS STONE CORRELATIONS
January 11, 2024
Michael Pell continues his narrative about the significance of the Taurus Constellation in relationship to the Horned Bull Taurus Stone at Giant's Playground Complex in the Montana Megaliths North. See the previous article here: Giant's Playground Complex
Michael Pell continues his narrative about the significance of the Taurus Constellation in relationship to the Horned Bull Taurus Stone at Giant's Playground Complex in the Montana Megaliths North. See the previous article here: Giant's Playground Complex
Horned Bull Taurus Stone
|
Horned Bull Taurus Stone
Graphic by Χρυσιδης Γεωργιος |
Michael Pell continues:
With the emerging of the Sumerians, ancient Egyptians, etc., in the past connections between these pockets of human civilization appear to be more likely as additional evidence becomes known. Evidence is not proof, but provides a link that needs to be examined honestly to see if there is a true connection or not.
There is thought that migrating of the people around the globe may have happened following and tracing DNA appearances. We have the Out of Africa, Out of Australia, Bering Strait scenarios. Some feel that North America may have been populated in part from South Americans that moved northward. The role glacial ice fields may have had. The Clovis, etc.
A bovine themed connection may not be out of the question when we stop and realize that if people were migrating at the time of Sumer’s development, it may well have been possible.
The Sumerians themselves were said to have come from the north of that region to settle and develop the area known as Sumer. From whence did they actually come from?
The period 4,320bce - 2,160 bce is known as the House of Taurus through precession and matches the period when Sumer came “online”. As they had been moving, so too may have other cultures in addition to them.
If the Montana megalith region was being re-populated well after the ice age to it’s north had retreated and as I believe, a life/death/rebirth motif being paid homage to I find the bovine head and disc looking much like the female reproductive system, associated with Hathor, etc., works well with the Phoenix bird, Bennu bird, Cygnus swan also in that area.
Again, these are just ideas put forth but the theme seems constant if that is the basis for what we are seeing.
With the emerging of the Sumerians, ancient Egyptians, etc., in the past connections between these pockets of human civilization appear to be more likely as additional evidence becomes known. Evidence is not proof, but provides a link that needs to be examined honestly to see if there is a true connection or not.
There is thought that migrating of the people around the globe may have happened following and tracing DNA appearances. We have the Out of Africa, Out of Australia, Bering Strait scenarios. Some feel that North America may have been populated in part from South Americans that moved northward. The role glacial ice fields may have had. The Clovis, etc.
A bovine themed connection may not be out of the question when we stop and realize that if people were migrating at the time of Sumer’s development, it may well have been possible.
The Sumerians themselves were said to have come from the north of that region to settle and develop the area known as Sumer. From whence did they actually come from?
The period 4,320bce - 2,160 bce is known as the House of Taurus through precession and matches the period when Sumer came “online”. As they had been moving, so too may have other cultures in addition to them.
If the Montana megalith region was being re-populated well after the ice age to it’s north had retreated and as I believe, a life/death/rebirth motif being paid homage to I find the bovine head and disc looking much like the female reproductive system, associated with Hathor, etc., works well with the Phoenix bird, Bennu bird, Cygnus swan also in that area.
Again, these are just ideas put forth but the theme seems constant if that is the basis for what we are seeing.
|
Buddha Montana faces north. Across the ravine the Horned Bull Taurus Stone faces South.
Michael Pell continues: Julie Ryder, the Buddha facing north on the south side of the ravine looking at the bull is matched in the sky by the following correlation. Not that this is what is represented, but if it was, it would match. Based on the physical ravine at the Montana site representing the “cosmic ravine” created by the area between the celestial equator and ecliptic lines as projected into space. Mirrored on the ground. Now instead of Buddha, what IF it was representative of Orion the hunter? When compared to the sky Orion is on the southern equator side of the cosmic ravine looking north to the northern side of the cosmic ravine at the bull constellation, Taurus (which faces south). The match can be seen in this diagram (showing the Cosmic Ravine). |
|
This book, (Garden of the Elder Gods) discusses a good scenario for a south to north migration in the Americas worth the read. |
|
The bovine disc idol looks
very similar to the golden artifact. |
|
|
Compare the gold and silver object to this diagram of the female reproductive system (Chakra 2). Look familiar? |
March 3, 2024, Michael Pell wrote:
Sad that others take work of someone and present it as their own without at least giving credit to the original source. Building off of ideas of others is a standard method, but more in a collective cooperative format. An exception might be when one is debunking another’s theory with facts or reasonable theories at least.
When the truth of a matter is the desired goal for the benefit of everyone and not for the profit of someone for themselves, working together or even in opposing directions are two options. Not as an ego driven contest but more in the spirit of what works, what doesn’t, so future research can move forward is at least for me, the way to go.
Julie Ryder and her husband Bill have done much work regarding the Montana Megaliths. While still in the exploratory phase, examining the evidence opens the doors to ideas as to what it is we see, what is it saying and when was it developed as a “message”.
The problem with usurping the data as one’s own and then whether deliberately or unintentionally coming to erroneous conclusions, is not just the usurper and their conclusions dismissed, but all too often the entire topic from other more credible sources.
UFOlogy would be one example. Something that contains some interesting findings needing credible explanations down to the tin foil hat version. Guilty by association is both unfair and unwise.
Personally, Julie and Bill share OPENLY what they do to a point deemed safe and FOR THE GOOD OF THE RESEARCH AND PHYSICAL AREA ITSELF.
In short, they protect the land and appreciate the gift of knowledge it contains. She is the guardian and treats it as such. It is a calling and both she and Bill hear and respond to it.
It is an honour to call her and Bill a friend.
Sad that others take work of someone and present it as their own without at least giving credit to the original source. Building off of ideas of others is a standard method, but more in a collective cooperative format. An exception might be when one is debunking another’s theory with facts or reasonable theories at least.
When the truth of a matter is the desired goal for the benefit of everyone and not for the profit of someone for themselves, working together or even in opposing directions are two options. Not as an ego driven contest but more in the spirit of what works, what doesn’t, so future research can move forward is at least for me, the way to go.
Julie Ryder and her husband Bill have done much work regarding the Montana Megaliths. While still in the exploratory phase, examining the evidence opens the doors to ideas as to what it is we see, what is it saying and when was it developed as a “message”.
The problem with usurping the data as one’s own and then whether deliberately or unintentionally coming to erroneous conclusions, is not just the usurper and their conclusions dismissed, but all too often the entire topic from other more credible sources.
UFOlogy would be one example. Something that contains some interesting findings needing credible explanations down to the tin foil hat version. Guilty by association is both unfair and unwise.
Personally, Julie and Bill share OPENLY what they do to a point deemed safe and FOR THE GOOD OF THE RESEARCH AND PHYSICAL AREA ITSELF.
In short, they protect the land and appreciate the gift of knowledge it contains. She is the guardian and treats it as such. It is a calling and both she and Bill hear and respond to it.
It is an honour to call her and Bill a friend.
NANCY BRIGGS
Nancy Briggs writes:
Just doing the work to anchor in the Angelic Energies with Julie Ryder a few years back. My how time flies! Now, 5 years later, I'm noticing the energies anchored to the land in the photo are shaped in the golden figure 8 infinity symbol. That was not preplanned at that time, it just happened spontaneously as we were connecting with the land energetically.
I'm guided to notice it now, so it must be a sign we were connecting heaven on Earth and anchoring those frequencies to the land we stand.
The DIVINE shows us signs all the time, but we may not connect the dots to their meaning until much later. I'd say GR8 things are on the way and the higher realms are making the connections we need to help us understand they are working WITH us always to help, to heal, to reveal what we need to know and be aware of! Much Love to all involved, and THANKS Julie, for your courage, strength, and determination to help and heal and make the connections. The God Squad seems to be doing much behind the scenes to shift things in humanities favor for the highest and greatest good of all that is.
Just doing the work to anchor in the Angelic Energies with Julie Ryder a few years back. My how time flies! Now, 5 years later, I'm noticing the energies anchored to the land in the photo are shaped in the golden figure 8 infinity symbol. That was not preplanned at that time, it just happened spontaneously as we were connecting with the land energetically.
I'm guided to notice it now, so it must be a sign we were connecting heaven on Earth and anchoring those frequencies to the land we stand.
The DIVINE shows us signs all the time, but we may not connect the dots to their meaning until much later. I'd say GR8 things are on the way and the higher realms are making the connections we need to help us understand they are working WITH us always to help, to heal, to reveal what we need to know and be aware of! Much Love to all involved, and THANKS Julie, for your courage, strength, and determination to help and heal and make the connections. The God Squad seems to be doing much behind the scenes to shift things in humanities favor for the highest and greatest good of all that is.
ANTHONY CASTRO
|
|
|
|
Anthony Castro has traveled the world for over 40 years and has lived in Megalithic Sites for the last 16 years. His specialty is to find and photograph ancient megaliths that no one else has discovered.
The summer of 2022 was Tony's fifth year at the Montana Megaliths camping among these ancient stone beings and intentional constructs for weeks at a time.
When we explore together Tony often makes comments like, "There is a large robot like that one in Sri Lanka....or there is a feature like this in Peru, Egypt or Viet Nam." When I buy his breakfast at the Mountain Goode Restaurant he sometimes opens his laptop and shows me photos of ancient sites that compare to the Montana Megaliths in the USA. Six or seven hours later we order lunch.
See Tony comment about the Surprise Dolmen in this short video:
https://www.facebook.com/julie.ryder.5095/posts/5284560418326166
The summer of 2022 was Tony's fifth year at the Montana Megaliths camping among these ancient stone beings and intentional constructs for weeks at a time.
When we explore together Tony often makes comments like, "There is a large robot like that one in Sri Lanka....or there is a feature like this in Peru, Egypt or Viet Nam." When I buy his breakfast at the Mountain Goode Restaurant he sometimes opens his laptop and shows me photos of ancient sites that compare to the Montana Megaliths in the USA. Six or seven hours later we order lunch.
See Tony comment about the Surprise Dolmen in this short video:
https://www.facebook.com/julie.ryder.5095/posts/5284560418326166
|
|
JOCK DOUBLEDAY
|
|
Jock Doubleday
"The Game of Erosion"
The Ancients' Ecological Terraforming is apparent across Terra - "ecological" in this case meaning that the Ancients alternated hard structural layers and soft earthquake-mitigating layers, softer layers being the key to 1) soil creation and 2) mineral potency for plants to grow and the biosphere to thrive, as rain storms and creek flows and river flows slowly eroded those softer layers, day by day, across Terra.
Did the ancient race who created the Montana Megaliths - perhaps the same race as the continent builders, perhaps a different race - also plan for erosion, creating a thin layer of concrete to cover their concrete mega-forms, a thin layer that would, at the appropriate time, wear off to reveal their true purpose? What is that purpose?
The Terraforming of Terra - Ancient Ecological Terraforming, October 6, 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6JKosa1eBo&list=PL2D8BNSXd6pChbgBvZ1WP7P6PcF2N_KgI&index=20
#erosion #theAncients #TerraformingofTerra
Conversations with Jock Doubleday
|
|
Jock commented regarding the geopolymer coatings: "Hmm. 1) Amplification or 2) storage of energy being emitted? If so, then the mega-forms must have been created in the distant past, because the outer amplifiying/protective layers are wearing off."
Julie Ryder replied, " Jock Doubleday, that is an interesting theory worth exploring. According to the satellite deep geoscans there is evidence here of each epoch from the beginning of civilizations down until 12.800 years ago when an asteroid hit North America. This means that the MM have been built over and over again over hundreds of thousands of years. Since there are several matches here in Montana to other extremely ancient megaliths in other parts of the world and under the oceans it becomes apparent that these were built by a series of world wide highly advanced civilizations."
Julie Ryder replied, " Jock Doubleday, that is an interesting theory worth exploring. According to the satellite deep geoscans there is evidence here of each epoch from the beginning of civilizations down until 12.800 years ago when an asteroid hit North America. This means that the MM have been built over and over again over hundreds of thousands of years. Since there are several matches here in Montana to other extremely ancient megaliths in other parts of the world and under the oceans it becomes apparent that these were built by a series of world wide highly advanced civilizations."
|
|
In 2024, Miguel Angel Vergara gave permission to write about his teachings when he visited the Montana Megaliths.
Miguel posted on Facebook:
"On the First Day of the Month called “ POP” Day “ KAN”, when the Sun Reached its ZENITH in Yucatan at Noon, Something Wonderful happened from the Heart of the Sun.. the Darkness Dissipated.. there was Nothing to Create a Shadow at the Culminating Moment… Then, a Very Pure Drop of Sunlight..Descended and Touched the Upper Part of the Head of the Maya- Teachers in Meditation, Filling then with Light and Love as If it were a Drop of the Sun- Released from the Heart of the Sun as an Special Gift to All Humankind “… Y Que Asi Sea ,Asi Es y Hecho Está… and So Be It, So It Is, It is Done… IN LAKECH."
July 28, 2024
Miguel posted on Facebook:
"On the First Day of the Month called “ POP” Day “ KAN”, when the Sun Reached its ZENITH in Yucatan at Noon, Something Wonderful happened from the Heart of the Sun.. the Darkness Dissipated.. there was Nothing to Create a Shadow at the Culminating Moment… Then, a Very Pure Drop of Sunlight..Descended and Touched the Upper Part of the Head of the Maya- Teachers in Meditation, Filling then with Light and Love as If it were a Drop of the Sun- Released from the Heart of the Sun as an Special Gift to All Humankind “… Y Que Asi Sea ,Asi Es y Hecho Está… and So Be It, So It Is, It is Done… IN LAKECH."
July 28, 2024
QUANTUM EXPLANATION OF FLASH FOSSILIZATION
|
|
Graphic of my photograph of the Flash Fossilized Giant feet at
Dancing Giant Feet Complex by Igor Gontcharov
Dancing Giant Feet Complex by Igor Gontcharov
Igor Gontcharov commented on FaceBook:
Overlay of two images. Possibly a 6-finger morphology. The size would correspond closer to Gaia's quantum, Density-3 (Dimensions 7-8-9), rather than Tara Density-2 (Dimensions 4-5-6).
Overlay of two images. Possibly a 6-finger morphology. The size would correspond closer to Gaia's quantum, Density-3 (Dimensions 7-8-9), rather than Tara Density-2 (Dimensions 4-5-6).
When I asked for further enlightenment Igor replied:
Basic background for the numbers below - to simplify, we have 5 Densities (DN), each consisting of 3 dimensions, each density similarly is structured, but matter density is different. Earth is currently in DN-1, but this DN-1 suffers from code-convolution and molecular compaction. Body forms here are significantly smaller if we compare them to other DN-1 planets in other galaxies.
To see how we ended up with all this mess - the planet (which is itself a living being) is assembled from various fallen and organic templates and inhabitants from higher densities, which we perceive here in their petrified form because that's what we can perceive given the degradation of our genetic code. All time is simultaneous, but the higher the DN the more into the future it will appear to us since we vector-locked here.
Our Milky Way galaxy fell out from the Andromeda Galaxy and is a fallen Phantom Galaxy, so it is a fallen part of Andromeda. Fall is nothing but a misalignment in the template that doesn't allow organic energy circulation and so things are smaller here, more compacted. DN-1 Earth is where we are - we also call it NET Earth because we are under the frequency fence (NET for Nibiruan Electrostatic Transduction field) and don't see various parts of our planet - several hibernation zones (Atlantis, Oz, Olympus...), Non-NETed Median Earth. In other words our original Earth (aka Amenti Earth) is fragmented and subject to mutation and we perceive a small portion only. DN-2 Earth is Tara (we see it as Alcyone), which is in the future but fell in frequency and ended up here as our Solar System for the purposes of bioregenesis.
Our Earth is called Gaia (Polaris) in DN-3 and it is also fallen. Earth in DN-4 is Aramatena, it is largely fallen too and the planet/star is blown up to seal us here in the fallen Phantom matrix. Anyway, this is just to explain that beings in higher DNs hold more quantum and appear larger - x12 quantum larger. That is the basis for calculating the origin of various remains from other space-time locations.
We do have conversation charts to study how things would relate to each other in an organic system, and we do know some of the distortions to calculate relations in fallen systems, if anyone is interested then you can find this information in Keylontic Science and Tan-Tri-Ahura Teachings. Earth's surface layer is an assemblage of various things in various conditions that ended up here, this is not to deny but to provide detail to the conventional planetary evolutionary perspective. Love.
Basic background for the numbers below - to simplify, we have 5 Densities (DN), each consisting of 3 dimensions, each density similarly is structured, but matter density is different. Earth is currently in DN-1, but this DN-1 suffers from code-convolution and molecular compaction. Body forms here are significantly smaller if we compare them to other DN-1 planets in other galaxies.
To see how we ended up with all this mess - the planet (which is itself a living being) is assembled from various fallen and organic templates and inhabitants from higher densities, which we perceive here in their petrified form because that's what we can perceive given the degradation of our genetic code. All time is simultaneous, but the higher the DN the more into the future it will appear to us since we vector-locked here.
Our Milky Way galaxy fell out from the Andromeda Galaxy and is a fallen Phantom Galaxy, so it is a fallen part of Andromeda. Fall is nothing but a misalignment in the template that doesn't allow organic energy circulation and so things are smaller here, more compacted. DN-1 Earth is where we are - we also call it NET Earth because we are under the frequency fence (NET for Nibiruan Electrostatic Transduction field) and don't see various parts of our planet - several hibernation zones (Atlantis, Oz, Olympus...), Non-NETed Median Earth. In other words our original Earth (aka Amenti Earth) is fragmented and subject to mutation and we perceive a small portion only. DN-2 Earth is Tara (we see it as Alcyone), which is in the future but fell in frequency and ended up here as our Solar System for the purposes of bioregenesis.
Our Earth is called Gaia (Polaris) in DN-3 and it is also fallen. Earth in DN-4 is Aramatena, it is largely fallen too and the planet/star is blown up to seal us here in the fallen Phantom matrix. Anyway, this is just to explain that beings in higher DNs hold more quantum and appear larger - x12 quantum larger. That is the basis for calculating the origin of various remains from other space-time locations.
We do have conversation charts to study how things would relate to each other in an organic system, and we do know some of the distortions to calculate relations in fallen systems, if anyone is interested then you can find this information in Keylontic Science and Tan-Tri-Ahura Teachings. Earth's surface layer is an assemblage of various things in various conditions that ended up here, this is not to deny but to provide detail to the conventional planetary evolutionary perspective. Love.
Montana Megaliths You Tube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdFeIhHZdjebI7WPgN-guhQ
Montana Megaliths on the Galacticfacets website:
https://www.galacticfacets.com/
Julie Ryder's Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/julie.ryder.5095
Copyright by Julie Ryder 2011 through 2024
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdFeIhHZdjebI7WPgN-guhQ
Montana Megaliths on the Galacticfacets website:
https://www.galacticfacets.com/
Julie Ryder's Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/julie.ryder.5095
Copyright by Julie Ryder 2011 through 2024